Steve and Jen bring you this daily review of the news
Premium Advertiser

News Blog Sponsors

News Links

BBC World Service
The Guardian
Washington Post
Iraq Order of Battle
NY Times
LA Times
ABC News

Blogs We Like

Daily Kos
Digby's Blog
Operation Yellow Elephant
Iraq Casualty Count
Media Matters
Talking Points
Defense Tech
Intel Dump
Soldiers for the Truth
Margaret Cho
Juan Cole
Just a Bump in the Beltway
Baghdad Burning
Howard Stern
Michael Moore
James Wolcott
Cooking for Engineers
There is No Crisis
Whiskey Bar
Rude Pundit
Crooks and Liars
Amazin' Avenue
DC Media Girl
The Server Logs

Blogger Credits

Powered by Blogger

Archives by
Publication Date
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
Comments Credits
Comments by YACCS
Wednesday, December 06, 2006

Fantasies of Iraq

Most people, including the incoming chairman of the House Select Intelligence Committee Silvestre Reyes, think the militias can be handled, eliminated.

People don't look at maps.

But they should.

There are two, maybe three million people in Sadr. As many people as in Brooklyn. Now, do you think an army of 170,000 could conquer Brooklyn if every home had an AK in the house?

No. Of course not.


Because the minute your hit Brooklyn Heights, you would have to take every block.

We are way, way, past doing anything to Sadr, controlling the militias or saving our puppet government.

When we tried in 2004, it was a bad idea. And despite delusltory training, they stood up to the US Army. They got hammered, but they ran back to Sadr City and regrouped. Now, the US has spent billions in Sadr City, only problem, the mullahs got all the credit for it.

I mean, you hear people talk about sending what, 20-30K more men into Baghdad to deal with the militias. What do they think the militias are? A bunch of stumblebums? No, they are trained, we trained them, and so did the Iranians.

So we roll into Sadr City looking for the militias. Who promptly go home or to Najaf or Basra and chill until we've finished stomping around. Why? Because we can't stay there. Or they fight. From a nearly bottomless supply of men. Every move in Sadr City is watched.

See, this is Sadr City up close.

Wanna go for a drive in a slum of 2m+ people?

This is where Casey Sheehan got killed in 2004. Fighting the nascient Mahdi Army.

The Iraqi puppet government demanded the US leave there a few weeks ago.

People use abstract terms, like control the militias, without understanding what the fuck that means.

It looks like Hakim is going to try to sucker the US into going after Sadr. Which means the US loses and Hakim moves bach to Tehran. Why? Because he hasn't got the support to beat Sadr. He's got the money, but he doesn't have the support of the people.

When I hear people say "they're gonna take care of Sadr", I shiver, because that would send Iraq into a frenzy. It is literally the stupidest fucking move possible. Is he crazy, maybe, but he's outfoxed everyone else, everyone who wanted him to disappear. The Hakims, never as popular as their press, have to look for a new patron so he can best Sadr and kill Sunnis.

The problem, as a poster pointed out in comments, is that at no point has Hakim ever stood for Iraqi nationalism. He's worked with Iranians and now Americans to get what he wants, and that means he's never gonna have the trust of people who survived Saddam or the Iranian war. If I was a Sadrist, I would be posting the picture of Hakim and Bush all over Sadr City.

What I think some people are confused by is the fact that while I have predicted Sadr and the Sadrists as the ulitmate winners, that I might think that's the preferred outcome, it is far from that. Sadr and his militias are thugs at best, and genocidal killers at worse. But because the exiles are ineffective and Saddam killed any possible opposition, he's likely to be the last man standing.

We made Sadr's rise possible, and we are three years too late to stop him. A dead Sadr is a martyr who's words can be shaped by the living. A live Sadr isn't much better. But regardless, trying to stop the Shia train by meeting with torturers and murderers isn't going to work. A real leader wouldn't be kissing Bush's ass and trying to maniuplate him.

posted by Steve @ 1:41:00 AM

1:41:00 AM

The News Blog home page


Editorial Staff

Add to My AOL

Support The News Blog

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
News Blog Food Blog
Visit the News Blog Food Blog
The News Blog Shops
Operation Yellow Elephant
Enlist, Young Republicans