Steve and Jen bring you this daily review of the news
Premium Advertiser

News Blog Sponsors

News Links

BBC World Service
The Guardian
Washington Post
Iraq Order of Battle
NY Times
LA Times
ABC News

Blogs We Like

Daily Kos
Digby's Blog
Operation Yellow Elephant
Iraq Casualty Count
Media Matters
Talking Points
Defense Tech
Intel Dump
Soldiers for the Truth
Margaret Cho
Juan Cole
Just a Bump in the Beltway
Baghdad Burning
Howard Stern
Michael Moore
James Wolcott
Cooking for Engineers
There is No Crisis
Whiskey Bar
Rude Pundit
Crooks and Liars
Amazin' Avenue
DC Media Girl
The Server Logs

Blogger Credits

Powered by Blogger

Archives by
Publication Date
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
Comments Credits
Comments by YACCS
Friday, May 19, 2006

Bye bye Bush


Kevin Phillips

The Incredible Shrinking President

George W. Bush’s job approval just hit 29% in one national poll, and the incredible shrinking presidency keeps making new lows. In some Northern states, the man’s job numbers are down in the teens.

Two months ago, it was suggested in this space that the prospect of having a lame-brain lame duck in the White House for nearly three more years suggested that serious consideration be given to possibilities whereby he might be replaced.

This has taken on even greater gravity in the last few days because of the rumors swirling about the imminence of the special prosecutor indicting White House political chief Karl Rove for perjury related to the outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame.

Were such an indictment to come, Bush might be hard-pressed to survive, and with the same scandal lapping at the shoes of Vice President Dick Cheney, it’s likely that any retirement-cum-resignation would have to be a double one. Democrats might be secretly thrilled by the possibility of having a crippled, muddied President Cheney for two years, but such a succession would never fly with the public.

I realize that this is still pure speculation, by legal yardsticks entirely premature. However, the succession aspect is extraordinary. Under the Constitution, the resignation of Bush and Cheney would hand the presidency to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, at present Dennis Hastert, a former high school wrestling coach, well liked but manifestly less than qualified for promotion. Wise Republicans, however, would be aware of a critical anomaly: the person elected as Speaker of the House does not, as a matter of law, have to be a Member of the House. If Bush and Cheney were obliged to resign this summer, the House GOP could elect as Speaker a plausible interim president and have the presidency devolve on him. Someone like Indiana Senator Richard Lugar, the respected Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, comes to mind.

On the other hand, were Cheney at least as soiled as Bush, he could resign first and Bush could name some Lugar-like figure (who would clearly be confirmed) as vice-president in place of Cheney. Then if Bush resigned, an ethically acceptable Republican successor would be in place before any November Democratic takeover of Congress.

For such things to unfold against the backdrop of this year’s midterm Congressional elections would be little short of tumultuous. The notion that the next president would be chosen through or by Congress would dominate the autumn debate. It might ensure a Democratic landslide – but it might also give dispirited, Bush-weary Republicans a rallying point.

On top of which, two other contemporary circumstances – Bush’s 29% approval and the crumbling consumer confidence that has eroded the stock market indexes – suggest that economic developments between now and November could also increase the likelihood of a Democratic takeover of Congress. Come January, that would make California Democrat Nancy Pelosi the next House Speaker, and she would become the next president in the event of Bush and Cheney resigning or being forced out of office in 2007.

Still, the Democrats could easily replace Pelosi with a national figure in the same way that the Republicans could replace Hastert. They could even make former president Bill Clinton Speaker on a few days’ notice. Although he has already served two terms, the Constitutional prohibition against a president being elected to more than two terms would probably not apply to a former president taking the Oval Office by devolution in a line of succession.

Will it happen? Probably not. But over the last half century, only two prior presidents’ job ratings have dipped below 30% – Nixon before he resigned and Carter before he was defeated in the 1980 election.
The replacement of George W. Bush, if necessary, stands to be a little more complicated.
I think it's more likely that the 25th Amendment will come into play. Bush is into deep denial, and he's foolishly hung his entire presidency on an improving Iraq. Which means that the resistance pull off a few big attacks and Bush is spiraling.

I know a lot of liberals think this is as real as Lord of the Rings, but Phillips is the man who built the modern GOP success with the Southern Strategy, and like atomic bomb scientist Leo Szilard came to regret his creation.

What he's talking about is unlikely for this reason, Cheney isn't well. If this is the scenario, Dick Lugar or John Warner will be vice president before Bush quits or is forced out. When Rove is indicted, Cheney and Rumsfeld become anchors to Bush.

Even if Rove wasn't indicted, Abramoff and Wilkes are growing like mold in a New Orleans house, at some point they hit the White House. But given the fact that no one is saying an indictment is unlikely, this is about to get ugly for Bush and for us.

From what I understand, Bush double crossed the House, demanding making illegal immigration become a felony, then turning against it. Why would he do that?

The problem is that he's already tossed away the hispanic vote and now he can't placate the base.

I still wonder how this happened, how Bush could alienate everyone and unleash some of the worst bigotry seen in years. This is the law of unintended consequences. The base cannot save you when that's all that's left.

posted by Steve @ 12:47:00 AM

12:47:00 AM

The News Blog home page


Editorial Staff

Add to My AOL

Support The News Blog

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
News Blog Food Blog
Visit the News Blog Food Blog
The News Blog Shops
Operation Yellow Elephant
Enlist, Young Republicans