Steve and Jen bring you this daily review of the news
Premium Advertiser

News Blog Sponsors

News Links

BBC World Service
The Guardian
Washington Post
Iraq Order of Battle
NY Times
LA Times
ABC News

Blogs We Like

Daily Kos
Digby's Blog
Operation Yellow Elephant
Iraq Casualty Count
Media Matters
Talking Points
Defense Tech
Intel Dump
Soldiers for the Truth
Margaret Cho
Juan Cole
Just a Bump in the Beltway
Baghdad Burning
Howard Stern
Michael Moore
James Wolcott
Cooking for Engineers
There is No Crisis
Whiskey Bar
Rude Pundit
Crooks and Liars
Amazin' Avenue
DC Media Girl
The Server Logs

Blogger Credits

Powered by Blogger

Archives by
Publication Date
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
Comments Credits
Comments by YACCS
Saturday, January 15, 2005

See what you did

traitor, lying sack of shit, you make the call

In the Crossfire...

NOVAK: Howard Dean is running for Democratic National Chairman the same way he ran for President-- as the squeaky clean candidate. Well, he may have been squeaky, but he wasn’t so clean. Zephyr Teachout who was head of internet outreach for the Dean campaign has revealed the campaign hired two political bloggers to say positive things about Dr. Dean at the price of $3,000 a month-- that’s play for pay. Meanwhile, one of the great former DNC chairmen, Bob Strauss, has endorsed one of the candidates, and it is indeed former Congressman Martin Frost, who, like Strauss, is a moderate and a Texan. Will the DNC members be that smart?

BEGALA: I don’t know. First, if in fact people were paid to flak Howard Dean and didn’t disclose it, that’s reprehensible. We talked about that earlier with Armstrong Williams, and the same standard should apply to liberals.

Lawyers say never take advice from the opposition.

Let's start there.

Now, Paul Begala, who has no use for Howard Dean, could have cleared this up with a phone call. But why bother. After all, slandering people is no big deal for the Beltway Kool Kids. And it's why Jon Stewart made him look like an asshole on his own show.

Open letter to Zephyr Teachout:

Ms. Teachout, here's a lesson they teach you in reporting I, words have consequences.

When you were being all cute and clever with the WSJ, didn't you get they had an agenda? Or did you not care? Now, this lie, a lie you help spread, is going to have to be refuted over and over. Why? Because you didn't get a job, people didn't jump on your bandwagon? You absolute fucking idiot. You goddamn halfwit, you stirred up shit for no fucking reason.

Now, let's be clear. Some campaign staff thought if they paid off Kos and Jerome, they'd say nice things about Howard Dean. Was this deal ever implicit in any contract signed by anyone. Was it tossed around in front of them? Of course not. It was some Machiavellian thinking they could leverage an advantage and like most Machiavellian plans, didn't work, did it? Because Kos's site was an open forum for everyone, Clark supporters, Dean supporters, even Edwards supporters. So it was a stupid plan.

Secondly, Kos was careful, having not fallen asleep in his laws chool classes, to declare his conflicts right on his blog, from the first day he worked for Dean. Jerome stopped blogging. Now, I'm not a lawyer, but I did go to J school and as I understand that, doing that is not hiding anything.

Now, because you implied that Kos took a bribe from Dean, that assclown traitor Bob Novak can use it to deflect attention from Armstrong Williams illegal dealings. And you should know the difference. Even if Kos hid his association, that's campaign money, not federal contracts and the legal implications are vastly different.

Do you think that because you shit on two honest people that people will now listen to your little hobby horse about ethics?

Are you fucking kidding me? Your ethics suck. You would buy coverage for a candidate. So exactly why should I listen to you?

Here's the deal: just shut the fuck up. Your carelessness has caused an amazing amount of harm for a non-issue. And Kos will have to explain, in interview after interview, that he was not paid to say nice things about Howard Dean. Why? Because you unfairly implied that he did so. In a just world, no Democratic candidate would work with you again.

But here's my promise: every time you bring up ethics in a public forum, I'll make sure to question your presence there and to object to it. If some campaign has the misfortune to hire you, I'll not only refuse to give money to that campaign as long as you work for them, but encourage others to do the same.

Why? Because you are a reckless, spiteful person and you don't need to be around politics.

If Kos had taken money from Dean to say nice things, I would have violently objected. But since he didn't do that, I violently object to implying he did.

Hopefully, you'll find a new career in another field, because I will do everything in my power to make your name poison to anyone who cares about progressive politics.

posted by Steve @ 1:25:00 AM

1:25:00 AM

The News Blog home page


Editorial Staff

Add to My AOL

Support The News Blog

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
News Blog Food Blog
Visit the News Blog Food Blog
The News Blog Shops
Operation Yellow Elephant
Enlist, Young Republicans