Steve and Jen bring you this daily review of the news
Premium Advertiser

News Blog Sponsors

News Links

BBC World Service
The Guardian
Washington Post
Iraq Order of Battle
NY Times
LA Times
ABC News

Blogs We Like

Daily Kos
Digby's Blog
Operation Yellow Elephant
Iraq Casualty Count
Media Matters
Talking Points
Defense Tech
Intel Dump
Soldiers for the Truth
Margaret Cho
Juan Cole
Just a Bump in the Beltway
Baghdad Burning
Howard Stern
Michael Moore
James Wolcott
Cooking for Engineers
There is No Crisis
Whiskey Bar
Rude Pundit
Crooks and Liars
Amazin' Avenue
DC Media Girl
The Server Logs

Blogger Credits

Powered by Blogger

Archives by
Publication Date
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
Comments Credits
Comments by YACCS
Saturday, December 02, 2006

Why the Sunnis won't be returning to power

(AFP/Ahmad Al Rubaye)

It's really not all that complex.

The Sunni middle class and professional class now live in Jordan and Syria and London. Even the parliament lives there.

They have pretty much been chased out of Iraq by the marauding bands of Shia militiamen called the Mahdi Army or the Badr Organization.

And given the demographic and geographic realities of the situation, the Shia control access to Iraq's only port and the Gulf, as well as the oil, a Sunni revival isn't going to happen any time soon.

Besides, the Shia, all the Shia parties are committed to preventing that at any price, for obvious reasons.

While the Sunnis control Anbar province, they don't control anything else, and in mixed areas, the Shia are eviciting them by force.

What people are forgetting is that Saudi threats to help the Sunni are a joke. The Saudi Army is dysfunctional and is watched by the Saudi National Guard. Neither of which has been able to prevent al Qaeda terrorism there. The idea of the Saudis rolling north is amusing. They won't get past the bridges at Nasyariah. The US Marines barely did.

What no one wants, even Iran, is the genocide of the Iraqi Sunnis.

Sadr's main goal is ensure that the Shia have the same power the Sunnis did. Not less. No one ever asked the Sunnis to share power, despite their minority status, and now people expect magnanimity from the Shia where none existed before.

People who think Sadr is going to lose now live in a fantasy world.

A: The vast majority of Iraqis are poor Shia, maybe 50 percent of the entire population of the country. All poor might be 80 percent. But clearly, the average Iraqi is a poor Shia.

B: The Sadrist movement is the party of the Shia poor. Which is why Sistani backed the Badr Organization. People feared a movement of the Shia poor.

C: Sadr has access to more money and men than anyone in Iraq, including the Kurds. The oil runs through Shia lands, so does the country's port, and in Baghdad alone, he can raise an army of 100,000 to protest the Green Zone on any day. While the Mahdi Army has far fewer effectives, the loyalty to Sadr within the vast majority of Shia is unquestioned.

In a resistance movement or a liberation movement, exiles rarely take power. Why? Because they are usually unable to claim authentic leadership. There are exceptions, like DeGaulle, but that was based on his open opposition to Vichy. But for the most part, to lead the country, you have to lead the resistance, like Ho Chi Mihn.

The American puppets, Maliki, the Hakims, all lived in exile before 2003. The Sadr family did not.

So when people are asking who represents them, it's the Sadr family. They challenged Saddam and lived. They survived the Shia uprising and the years of repression. So when Sadr talks about the past, it is a shared past they lived.

Even if he died, his followers would turn him into a heroic martyr for his people in a religion which venerates martyrs.

Sistani backed the Hakims, and now they don't know which way to turn. Sadr out fought them in Basra, and controls Baghdad. Their main strength is in the Army. The Hakims had money and Iranian support, and were able to use that money to buy an army and political power, but as the battle moves to the streets, they aren't able to compete.

So now, they'll go talk to Bush. Which could be a way of delivering a message or of admitting weakness. Either way, Hakim is now in second place and knows it.

posted by Steve @ 2:27:00 PM

2:27:00 PM

The News Blog home page


Editorial Staff

Add to My AOL

Support The News Blog

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
News Blog Food Blog
Visit the News Blog Food Blog
The News Blog Shops
Operation Yellow Elephant
Enlist, Young Republicans