Steve and Jen bring you this daily review of the news
Premium Advertiser

News Blog Sponsors

News Links

BBC World Service
The Guardian
Washington Post
Iraq Order of Battle
NY Times
LA Times
ABC News

Blogs We Like

Daily Kos
Digby's Blog
Operation Yellow Elephant
Iraq Casualty Count
Media Matters
Talking Points
Defense Tech
Intel Dump
Soldiers for the Truth
Margaret Cho
Juan Cole
Just a Bump in the Beltway
Baghdad Burning
Howard Stern
Michael Moore
James Wolcott
Cooking for Engineers
There is No Crisis
Whiskey Bar
Rude Pundit
Crooks and Liars
Amazin' Avenue
DC Media Girl
The Server Logs

Blogger Credits

Powered by Blogger

Archives by
Publication Date
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
Comments Credits
Comments by YACCS
Sunday, November 12, 2006

They have to be kidding

Why is that crackhead stealing my car?

Wal-Mart is unlike Oprah


Wal-Mart is unlike Oprah By RICK CASEY

What's the difference between Oprah and Wal-Mart?

When Oprah gives away cars, they're not somebody else's.

Martha Velazquez, a 30-year-old marketing specialist at a Houston health club, says she took her 1999 Pontiac Grand Am to the Wal-Mart in the 7000 block of FM 1960 to replace a flat tire she had bought there four months earlier.

"My mechanic told me it was punctured on the side and he couldn't fix it," she said.

She said the attendant at Wal-Mart told her the wait would be more than three hours, so she went shopping.

The mystery 'husband'

She spoke to the manager, who said he would replace the tire at no charge and moved her to the front of the line.

She said when it was finished the mechanic called her by name and said he could cash her out. She explained the manager said it would be free and asked her where the car was.

"He told me he gave the keys to my husband and he drove off," she said.

"He ran off. Another mechanic came over and asked how he could be so stupid that he would give it to that crackhead who had been bothering them all day," she said.

Wal-Mart: Claim denied

She knew the man had not only her car key, but also her house key and her address. She had left some mail in the car.

"I had to break my lease and get a hotel room," she said. "I was homeless and carless."

The car was found, but was damaged enough that, Velazquez said, her insurance company totaled it.

And, she says, she was somewhat traumatized by the whole event. She said Wal-Mart only made it worse by telling her that it had no responsibility.

A Wal-Mart spokesman issued this statement: "Ms. Velazquez's claim was denied by our claims department after a thorough investigation. It wouldn't be appropriate to comment in any greater detail at this time."

But a police report on the incident appears to offer what may be Wal-Mart's version of the story.

The mechanic who did the job told the investigating officer that a man approached him and claimed to be Velazquez's husband and he wanted to pick up the car.

The mechanic said he told the man he couldn't release the vehicle until the repair was paid for. He said the man told him he just wanted to put some things in the car and his wife would pay.

Velazquez has retained a lawyer and intends to pursue the matter in a court of law and the court of public opinion.

Wal-Mart has a reputation for fighting all lawsuits, but in this case the car was worth somewhere around $6,000 or $7,000, plus Velazquez's housing expenses.

Even if the damages reached $15,000, Wal-Mart could have avoided its own legal expenses, plus a possible jury award.

And it could have held onto a customer who will, instead, tell her story to every friend, stranger and TV camera that will pay attention.

Wal Mart really wants to litigate this? Are they kidding? This could go away for 20K, but now, it's going to cost them much more in bad publicity, publicity they hardly need.

But then, Wal Mart has a way of being stubborn with women and minorities.

posted by Steve @ 7:25:00 AM

7:25:00 AM

The News Blog home page


Editorial Staff

Add to My AOL

Support The News Blog

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
News Blog Food Blog
Visit the News Blog Food Blog
The News Blog Shops
Operation Yellow Elephant
Enlist, Young Republicans