Steve and Jen bring you this daily review of the news
Premium Advertiser

News Blog Sponsors

News Links

BBC World Service
The Guardian
Washington Post
Iraq Order of Battle
NY Times
LA Times
ABC News

Blogs We Like

Daily Kos
Digby's Blog
Operation Yellow Elephant
Iraq Casualty Count
Media Matters
Talking Points
Defense Tech
Intel Dump
Soldiers for the Truth
Margaret Cho
Juan Cole
Just a Bump in the Beltway
Baghdad Burning
Howard Stern
Michael Moore
James Wolcott
Cooking for Engineers
There is No Crisis
Whiskey Bar
Rude Pundit
Crooks and Liars
Amazin' Avenue
DC Media Girl
The Server Logs

Blogger Credits

Powered by Blogger

Archives by
Publication Date
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
Comments Credits
Comments by YACCS
Thursday, October 26, 2006


Ruth Fremson/The New York Times

Cindy Meneghin, right, and her partner, Maureen
Kilian, heard about the New Jersey Supreme Court’s
decision on gay marriage Wednesday at their lawyer’s
office in Newark. With them was Sarah, left, their daughter.

New Jersey Court Backs Full Rights for Gay Couples
Published: October 26, 2006

TRENTON, Oct. 25 — New Jersey’s highest court ruled on Wednesday that gay couples are entitled to the same legal rights and financial benefits as heterosexual couples, but ordered the Legislature to decide whether their unions must be called marriage or could be known by another name.

In a decision filled with bold and sweeping pronouncements about equality, the New Jersey Supreme Court gave the Democratic-controlled Legislature 180 days to either expand existing laws or come up with new ones to provide gay couples benefits including tuition assistance, survivors’ benefits under workers’ compensation laws, and spousal privilege in criminal trials.

I'm pissed.

Here we have a perfect wedge issue, and because of a few pedophile-protecting gay Republicans, you can't use it any more.

I mean, how can you gin up fear of gays luring kids into the homo "lifestyle" when you have Congressmen facing jail for doing just that.

Some comrades asked if this would hurt Dems.

This is not 2004.

The fear of the gay seducer is negated because we have real live child sex predators hunting Congressional pages and a gay "cabal" protecting them

Sure, this is going to be a dogfight in Trenton, but it's way too late to gin up the fundies, many of who are reliving Uncle Buddy's wandering hands every day they hear the words Mark Foley.

Two months ago, Dems would have been scrambling, now it's "yawn, let's talk about Mark Foley and Iraq. Signs of your failure"

posted by Steve @ 2:44:00 AM

2:44:00 AM

The News Blog home page


Editorial Staff

Add to My AOL

Support The News Blog

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
News Blog Food Blog
Visit the News Blog Food Blog
The News Blog Shops
Operation Yellow Elephant
Enlist, Young Republicans