Steve and Jen bring you this daily review of the news
Premium Advertiser

News Blog Sponsors

News Links

BBC World Service
The Guardian
Washington Post
Iraq Order of Battle
NY Times
LA Times
ABC News

Blogs We Like

Daily Kos
Digby's Blog
Operation Yellow Elephant
Iraq Casualty Count
Media Matters
Talking Points
Defense Tech
Intel Dump
Soldiers for the Truth
Margaret Cho
Juan Cole
Just a Bump in the Beltway
Baghdad Burning
Howard Stern
Michael Moore
James Wolcott
Cooking for Engineers
There is No Crisis
Whiskey Bar
Rude Pundit
Crooks and Liars
Amazin' Avenue
DC Media Girl
The Server Logs

Blogger Credits

Powered by Blogger

Archives by
Publication Date
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
Comments Credits
Comments by YACCS
Saturday, October 14, 2006

That pesky first amendment

I'm smarter than Jack Thompson

Judge doesn't object to video game `Bully'
A judge said that although he wouldn't want his children to play the video game Bully, it shouldn't be banned.

After previewing the controversial video game Bully, a circuit court judge in Miami-Dade County said the game is not violent enough for him to prevent it from being sold to minors.

''There's a lot of violence,'' Judge Ronald Friedman said in court Friday. ``A whole lot. Less than we see on television every night.''

In the PlayStation 2 game, available in stores Tuesday, the characters are bullied school children who can fight back by becoming bullies themselves through the use of violence, including using such weapons as slingshots. Guns are not used in the game.

Friedman said it wasn't bad enough to merit taking action: ``Does that mean I would want my children to view it? No. But does it rise to a point that its a nuisance? The answer is no from what I saw.''

Coral Gables attorney Jack Thompson, outspoken critic of violent games, filed a complaint in the 11th Judicial Circuit Court against Take-Two, the game's publisher, as well as Wal-Mart and GameStop. Take-Two owns Bully's label, Rockstar Games, the makers of the Grand Theft Auto series.

Thompson said the game, rated for ages 13 and up, shouldn't be sold to minors, calling it a ``Columbine simulator.''

''You did not see the game,'' Thompson told Friedman at Friday's hearing. ``You don't even know what it was you saw.''

It doesn't matter. Thompson would have ultimately lost and been lucky to have not had to pay Rockstar's fees, as the State of Illinois is doing after their unconstitional video game ban.

What is unclear about the First Amendment? Congress shall make no law abridging free speech. Ok.

posted by Steve @ 10:12:00 AM

10:12:00 AM

The News Blog home page


Editorial Staff

Add to My AOL

Support The News Blog

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
News Blog Food Blog
Visit the News Blog Food Blog
The News Blog Shops
Operation Yellow Elephant
Enlist, Young Republicans