Steve and Jen bring you this daily review of the news
Premium Advertiser

News Blog Sponsors

News Links

BBC World Service
The Guardian
Washington Post
Iraq Order of Battle
NY Times
LA Times
ABC News

Blogs We Like

Daily Kos
Digby's Blog
Operation Yellow Elephant
Iraq Casualty Count
Media Matters
Talking Points
Defense Tech
Intel Dump
Soldiers for the Truth
Margaret Cho
Juan Cole
Just a Bump in the Beltway
Baghdad Burning
Howard Stern
Michael Moore
James Wolcott
Cooking for Engineers
There is No Crisis
Whiskey Bar
Rude Pundit
Crooks and Liars
Amazin' Avenue
DC Media Girl
The Server Logs

Blogger Credits

Powered by Blogger

Archives by
Publication Date
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
Comments Credits
Comments by YACCS
Monday, October 16, 2006

The Magic Box

I can do anything

Ok, a lot of people are blathering on about Diebold stealing the election, but seem to not know anything about how elections are stolen.

Simply put, how many election districts was Diebold actually used in 2004?

4 out of 88.

That's right.

And I bet not one of you can tell me what Ohio's swing districts are, and which ones switched from Gore to Bush and by how much.

Bev Harris, who knew nothing about either elections, computers or statistics created a furor but never came up with a fact.

The same with Robert Kennedy's crappy piece in Rolling Stone. Lots of theories, no facts.

Why? Because the evidence of fraud would not be subtle. It would be out there, and clear to find.

All you need to show is that a district switched parties with no other reason, no increased GOTV, no change in population worthy of note, no change in the economy or increase in church membership. Not too hard to find. But, no one has found it.

Exit polling is a snapshot, and prone to distortions. Ask Tom Bradley. If exit polling was accurate, he'd have been governor of California.

Which is why I can't take claims of Diebold theft seriously. Because no one has bothered to do the simple, if time consuming charting of election patterns in suspect districts.

The reason the GOP wants you to worry about Diebold is simple: it's a distraction and a demoralizer. It's a handy excuse for doing nothing for pessimists.

Meanwhile, while you're worrying about a machine not used in most ED's, the GOP is directly going after the right to vote.

While millions of words have been pissed away on Diebold, the GOP has conducted an ongoing stealth campaign to deny millions of poor and elderly the right to vote, Florida 2000 writ large. And the silence on the blogs has been deafening. Diebold is easy to be scared of, but Voter ID laws are the real deal in voter suppression and targeted at the most dedicated voters, the elderly and minorities.

And they have been passing all over the South and now in the House. People have argued that, well, if they have Diebold, this is just icing on the cake. Bullshit. Diebold is a distraction, they want to taint the process of voting by alleging widespread fraud.

While Dems have been screaming about Diebold, the GOP has been screaming that minorities and illegals have voted illegally. But when researched, there is no evidence of voter fraud. None.

The fact is that you won't need Diebold if you scare people away from voting.

posted by Steve @ 8:03:00 AM

8:03:00 AM

The News Blog home page


Editorial Staff

Add to My AOL

Support The News Blog

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
News Blog Food Blog
Visit the News Blog Food Blog
The News Blog Shops
Operation Yellow Elephant
Enlist, Young Republicans