THE NEWS BLOG

 
Steve and Jen bring you this daily review of the news
Premium Advertiser

News Blog Sponsors

News Links

BBC World Service
The Guardian
Independent
Washington Post
Newsday
Iraq Order of Battle
Agonist
NY Times
LA Times
ABC News
CNN
Blogger

 
Blogs We Like

Daily Kos
Atrios
Digby's Blog
Skippy
Operation Yellow Elephant
Iraq Casualty Count
Uggabugga
Media Matters
Talking Points
Defense Tech
Intel Dump
Soldiers for the Truth
Margaret Cho
Juan Cole
Tbogg
Corrente
Gropinator
Just a Bump in the Beltway
Baghdad Burning
Wonkette
Howard Stern
Michael Moore
James Wolcott
Cooking for Engineers
There is No Crisis
Whiskey Bar
Rude Pundit
Driftglass
At-Largely
Crooks and Liars
Amazin' Avenue
DC Media Girl
The Server Logs

 
Blogger Credits

Powered by Blogger

Archives by
Publication Date
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
Comments Credits
Comments by YACCS
Thursday, October 19, 2006

After the Americans


The "new" meddle east

I had posted the other day that I think PMC's would play a role with the Shia uprising. But I didn't make things clear. As long as the Americans are on the ground in Iraq, that's not going to happen. Most of the PMC's are adjuncts of the West's elite forces, SAS, SEAL's, Delta, and are not going to go against western governments. First, they can't afford to with their government contracts, second, they have close ties to the US military, third, there are legal issues to content with.

But when US forces leave Iraq, as they will sooner rather than later, someone will step in to provide military services.

I think the mainline US PMC's will have too much other work to deal with, to have any desire to deal with Sadr or the Iranians. But someone will want those oil contracts.

After the US withdrawal, the Kurds will be desperate to seize Kirkuk, and thus, probably the first to hire professional soldiers. The Peshmerga is going to need an edge to hold on to Kirkuk and mercenaries will be that edge. Once the Shia realize that they don't have the military skill to actually disloge the Kurds, they're gonna need help as well.

And the sweetner is oil. Someone will have to run the oilfields, and they will have to win the confidence of the Shia. And they will have to protect the oil fields, the ones carefully sabotaged by the workers. Since the Shia will have to train and fight Sunnis and Kurds, they won't have many men to spare for security. Someone will need to do that job.

Then, of course, the Shia will need someone to create a real army and teach them to use their new, Russian weapons. Of course there are large numbers of unemployed Russian soldiers looking for a payday.

The map depicted above has been circulating around the internet, which means the Arab world as the future of the middle east. The Turks, who are our allies, get to lose a fifth of their country for the Kurds. Which proves the map was designed by a cretin, or Ralph Peters.

But my larger point is this, because of the oil, the lure of professional military services will be irresitable. It probably won't be the big US or UK companies, but what would stop South Americans or Pakistanis from jumping in the mix, or the Russians? There is money to be made.

posted by Steve @ 2:47:00 AM

2:47:00 AM

The News Blog home page





 

Editorial Staff
RSS-XML Feeds

Add to My AOL

Support The News Blog

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
News Blog Food Blog
Visit the News Blog Food Blog
The News Blog Shops
 
 
 
Operation Yellow Elephant
Enlist, Young Republicans