Steve and Jen bring you this daily review of the news
Premium Advertiser

News Blog Sponsors

News Links

BBC World Service
The Guardian
Washington Post
Iraq Order of Battle
NY Times
LA Times
ABC News

Blogs We Like

Daily Kos
Digby's Blog
Operation Yellow Elephant
Iraq Casualty Count
Media Matters
Talking Points
Defense Tech
Intel Dump
Soldiers for the Truth
Margaret Cho
Juan Cole
Just a Bump in the Beltway
Baghdad Burning
Howard Stern
Michael Moore
James Wolcott
Cooking for Engineers
There is No Crisis
Whiskey Bar
Rude Pundit
Crooks and Liars
Amazin' Avenue
DC Media Girl
The Server Logs

Blogger Credits

Powered by Blogger

Archives by
Publication Date
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
Comments Credits
Comments by YACCS
Saturday, September 09, 2006

Zealots make bad history

The furor over The Path to 9/11 is just the latest example of how conservatives want to use history to justify their war.

One week, it's World War II, the next, the Civil War, but the wars they don't talk about, Britian's bloody and unpopular Colonial Wars. They never use the history they don't like to explain what is happening.

There is no national committment to Iraq, so to compare it even to Vietnam is a stretch. This is closer to the end of the British colonial period than any American war.

But what I am coming to think is that ABC wasn't sure of what they were being sold. The producers and director have the ability to work around the network suits on a project which wasn't created by them. Bashing Disney was fun, but the roots of this lie in Richard Scaife and his never ending war against the Clintons. That doesn't mean ABC didn't act badly, but I don't think ABC execs realized how much the movie was driven by a dark, malevolent political agenda. The writer and director of the film are movement conservatives, which means they had an agenda and no talent.

They wanted to make a movie which placed most of the blame for 9/11 on Clinton, and not in a theoretical way. They wanted people to believe that Clinton could have killed Osama Bin Laden and refused to. That Madeline Albright, who survived the Nazis, would betray a CIA team to the Pakistanis to protect Osama. The director, David Cunningham and writer Cyrus Nowrasteh were movement conservatives. But not only movement conservatives, but tied to David Horowitz and thus Richard Scaife. They wanted to condemn Clinton on 9/11 in such a way as to cause him great scorn.

They weren't interested in history. They wanted to make a propegandistic film in the guise of history.

Some of the concern trolls are talking about censorship, but that isn't the case.

Take Mississippi Burning. The movie almost ignores blacks to make FBI agents the heroes. Talk about an abuse of history. I mean that's not close to reality, but it passed at the time, and it shouldn't. The FBI infiltrated black groups and blackmailed Martin Luther King.

To claim that the US could have killed Osama Bin Laden, and chose not to, is a lie. If you want to make a film of a historical event, you can't make Omaha Beach casuality free. Twisting history to effect is called historical fiction. It's sold in the fiction section of the bookstore.

What I think they sold ABC was factually based account of 9/11, knowing they would deliver something else and was being clever about it. When ABC was placed under seige, and this was from all corners, from Scholastic, from Apple, from freakin' Disneyland, they were shocked at the response. People cancelled their Disneyland trips over this. A Disneyland trip can cost $1500 easily.

Conservatives have not been able to use the internet for mass action as effectively as the Liberals. Part of that is systemic. Frei Republik will announce a rally a week ahead and get 15 people. The LA protest against Disney was done on the spur of the moment and got 30 people. Conservatives are less likely to engage in mass action on any level.

Which is also what caught ABC by surprise. In the 18 months after the 2004 election, liberals learned to mobilize quickly and effectively. No conservative protest against a network has been as quick or far reaching.

The reason for this is that Nowrasteh and Cunningham wanted to lie about 9/11, which is deeply offensive to people, and the kind of lie doesn't really matter. I don't care if you want to claim an explosion took down the towers or Clinton got blown by Osama, both offend me deeply, because they disrespect the dead.

When you abuse the truth of an event, no matter what it is, you disrespect those who survived it and those who died. Real people died that day, and in the days after. The funerals lasted for a year. For no other reason, the way they died needs to be explained fairly and honestly. And that goes beyond politics for anyone who wasn't a zealot.

In the days after 9/11, the best of America was on display. So why do zealots feel the need to hijack it to make their petty political points?

posted by Steve @ 1:50:00 AM

1:50:00 AM

The News Blog home page


Editorial Staff

Add to My AOL

Support The News Blog

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
News Blog Food Blog
Visit the News Blog Food Blog
The News Blog Shops
Operation Yellow Elephant
Enlist, Young Republicans