Steve and Jen bring you this daily review of the news
Premium Advertiser

News Blog Sponsors

News Links

BBC World Service
The Guardian
Washington Post
Iraq Order of Battle
NY Times
LA Times
ABC News

Blogs We Like

Daily Kos
Digby's Blog
Operation Yellow Elephant
Iraq Casualty Count
Media Matters
Talking Points
Defense Tech
Intel Dump
Soldiers for the Truth
Margaret Cho
Juan Cole
Just a Bump in the Beltway
Baghdad Burning
Howard Stern
Michael Moore
James Wolcott
Cooking for Engineers
There is No Crisis
Whiskey Bar
Rude Pundit
Crooks and Liars
Amazin' Avenue
DC Media Girl
The Server Logs

Blogger Credits

Powered by Blogger

Archives by
Publication Date
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
Comments Credits
Comments by YACCS
Wednesday, August 09, 2006

Lieberman lies about you

Sean Smith, this is a server

A Web Developer's View of Lieberman's Lie
by jasonwhat

It's amazing that is still a just a note telling Lamont to have his buddies stop attacking the site. As a fulltime web developer, and one who has worked on campaigns, I can tell you it takes all of 10 minutes to fix this problem. If you want to know the details they'll be below.

Update: Joe was using Joomla. What that means below.

According to this, Joe was using the Content Managment System Joomla. I don't use Joomla or Mambo much anymore (I'm a Drupal guy), but it is possible for these sites to get overloaded and go down. However, we would see a different type of error on the site if that was the case. Joomla would return a MySQL error most likely. The site would be running, but broken. From what is happening on the internal pages it looks like the host shut the site off and suspended it, not that Joomla broke. Still, any competent campaign would have this up within minutes (believe me, you watch your site nonstop in the 48 hours leading up to and including E-Day.). Oh, and it could take them all of 30 minutes to get a thier old Joomla data or even a new site up on a new host.

The Host:

  1. Any decent web host promises over 99% uptime and warns a client when their site is going over their limit and needs to be moved. Joe could've been on a decent dedicated server for 300-500/mo and not had these problems, but he went for the $15/mo option. Still the web host would have notified the campaign.
  2. Any decent host uses a backup system that means they can easily move a site to another server in a matter of minutes if there’s a problem.

Reality Check: Even a $5/mo web host won’t let their client be down for a whole day. It would violate their hosting policy of guaranteed uptime, which they never do.
The Domain:

  1. A domain is just an easier way of getting to the ip address, which is where the files that make up a site are actually hosted. If the Lieberman site was having problems that couldn’t be resolved on a day as important as this they would have either forwarded the domain, or parked it on a new host and server.
  2. Domain companies say changing the routing of a name (DNS entry) can take up to 24 hours to propogate across the web. In reality it usually takes 10-30 mins.
  3. I’m not sure exactly what they are using, but the Lieberman campaign ran a PHP site likely with a MySQL database. Their host would likely make weekly or daily updates. Many even now have by-the-minute updates of the files. The campaign would certainly backup the database because it contains all their supporter data. All of this can be uploaded to a new server within minutes. Also, even when the front end of a site is down, Admins usually have backend access to the files and database.

Reality Check: A decent webmaster would say, “Screw this, we’ll point the domain to a local computer that we run as a server or get new hosting and point the domain name there.” It would take an hour tops to be up and running. Of course, a decent webmaster or management company (like me, for example) always backs up client sites and places the files on a completely separate host so there is a seamless transition if it ever comes to this. Some very recent data would not be up on the new site, but all content would be and the site would be fully functioning.

The Campaign:

  1. Election Day is a big day for a website. Sure no money is coming in, but tons of new volunteers are. – well, maybe not for Joe, but for a likable candidate. The Field Director, Volunteer Coordinater, Webmaster, and DoO spend the weeks leading up to Election Day creating an intake and dispatch plan to handle the confirmed volunteers and expected walk-ins. The Webmaster is key because many people decide to help on Election day and go to the website to find out how. A site being down would be a disaster for a regular campaign, but maybe not for one paying all their Election Day “volunteers”.

Reality Check: No campaign would allow their site to be down for this amount of time, let alone on Election Day.

There is no website attack that could keep the site down this long. Usually the host would fix the problem in a matter of minutes…an hour at most. If that still didn’t work they could simply move the files and database to a new host and be up and running in no time.
It is clear that regardless of what caused the site to initially go down (crappy cheap hosting), the Lieberman Campaign chose to keep the site down and blame it on Lamont and his Whacky Commie Bloggers -- desperate lies of a desperate man.

The Lie:


STATEMENT FROM SEAN SMITH: "For the past 24 hours the Friends for Joe Lieberman's website and email has been totally disrupted and disabled, we believe that this is the result of a coordinated attack by our political opponents. The campaign has notified the US Attorney and the Connecticut Chief State's Attorney and the campaign will be filing a formal complaint reflecting our concerns. The campaign has also notified the State Attorney General Dick Blumenthal for his review."

"We call on Ned Lamont to make an unqualified statement denouncing this kind of dirty campaign trick and to demand whoever is responsible to cease and desist immediately. Any attempt to suppress voter participation and undermine the voting process on Election Day is deplorable and has no place in our democracy."

Lying bastard.

Why doesn't he tell people it was his decision to move the site to one his buddy ran, and ran poorly. That they took it from 2 Dog media.

No one hacked their site and they know it.

posted by Steve @ 12:51:00 AM

12:51:00 AM

The News Blog home page


Editorial Staff

Add to My AOL

Support The News Blog

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
News Blog Food Blog
Visit the News Blog Food Blog
The News Blog Shops
Operation Yellow Elephant
Enlist, Young Republicans