Steve and Jen bring you this daily review of the news
Premium Advertiser

News Blog Sponsors

News Links

BBC World Service
The Guardian
Washington Post
Iraq Order of Battle
NY Times
LA Times
ABC News

Blogs We Like

Daily Kos
Digby's Blog
Operation Yellow Elephant
Iraq Casualty Count
Media Matters
Talking Points
Defense Tech
Intel Dump
Soldiers for the Truth
Margaret Cho
Juan Cole
Just a Bump in the Beltway
Baghdad Burning
Howard Stern
Michael Moore
James Wolcott
Cooking for Engineers
There is No Crisis
Whiskey Bar
Rude Pundit
Crooks and Liars
Amazin' Avenue
DC Media Girl
The Server Logs

Blogger Credits

Powered by Blogger

Archives by
Publication Date
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
Comments Credits
Comments by YACCS
Monday, April 17, 2006


He has more pressing problems than who is
the next SecDef

It's solitaire for Rummy

Frustrated generals want him axed, but it would come with a price

In short, despite Bush's praise for him Friday, there is no compelling argument for keeping Rumsfeld. He fought the war the way he wanted, against the advice of many commanders, and it hasn't worked out. Military rules of accountability, not to mention election-year jockeying, could dictate a change. But even if Bush were to do an about-face and boot him, there are two questions that everyone, including the six retired generals demanding Rumsfeld's firing, must answer before the ax falls.

First, what would be the benefits of a new secretary?

Second, how would such a dramatic firing affect the morale of our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan?

As for the troop morale issue, virtually all reports, official and anecdotal, say it remains high. That is a credit to the character of our forces and their training. But how would they react if Rumsfeld, their boss, were booted because of the results? We can't know for sure, but it's hard to fathom how their morale or performance would improve. Most likely, an element of doubt would surface, about themselves and their mission. Doubt on the battlefield can be fatal.

Rumsfeld has said twice that he offered to quit, but that Bush refused to accept his resignation. Perhaps the third time will be the charm. Fair enough.

And then what?

The troops hate Rumsfeld, when they bother to think about him. They said so in 2003, and I don't think it's gotten any better. If they could, they'd have parties if he was canned.

The reason is simple: they think he doesn't give a shit about them. You know, Abu Ghraib, "you go with the Army you have", doesn't exactly inspire confidence.

But the fact is that if you have an squad to run, who runs DOD is not the top issue on your mind, it's your men, then staying alive. And after that, it's your fractured marriage, your debts, and what you want to do when you get home. It is not about the comments of retired generals on the SecDef.

Soldiers are far from stupid. This idea that criticism lowers morale is silly. Not allowing armored vests that work lowers morale, not getting rehabilitation for injuries lowers morale. Firing the SecDef doesn't, at least not this one.

Morale is high, but divorces are exploding and even generals are fleeing the Army. You believe that morale is high.

posted by Steve @ 12:25:00 AM

12:25:00 AM

The News Blog home page


Editorial Staff

Add to My AOL

Support The News Blog

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
News Blog Food Blog
Visit the News Blog Food Blog
The News Blog Shops
Operation Yellow Elephant
Enlist, Young Republicans