Steve and Jen bring you this daily review of the news
Premium Advertiser

News Blog Sponsors

News Links

BBC World Service
The Guardian
Washington Post
Iraq Order of Battle
NY Times
LA Times
ABC News

Blogs We Like

Daily Kos
Digby's Blog
Operation Yellow Elephant
Iraq Casualty Count
Media Matters
Talking Points
Defense Tech
Intel Dump
Soldiers for the Truth
Margaret Cho
Juan Cole
Just a Bump in the Beltway
Baghdad Burning
Howard Stern
Michael Moore
James Wolcott
Cooking for Engineers
There is No Crisis
Whiskey Bar
Rude Pundit
Crooks and Liars
Amazin' Avenue
DC Media Girl
The Server Logs

Blogger Credits

Powered by Blogger

Archives by
Publication Date
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
Comments Credits
Comments by YACCS
Tuesday, April 25, 2006

Battle of the titans

Doping is bad

FIFA May Amend Code on Doping

Published: April 25, 2006

Soccer's international governing body was told by arbitrators yesterday that its rules did not comply with World Anti-Doping Agency requirements. It is the latest step in a feud that could endanger soccer's status as an Olympic sport.

FIFA, which governs soccer worldwide, had said that its anti-doping rules matched the anti-doping agency's code, but the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne, Switzerland, had rejected that claim.

"With this legal opinion, which FIFA itself sought, C.A.S. has laid the foundations for resolving any differences that exist with regard to the World Anti-Doping Code," Joseph S. Blatter, the soccer federation's president, said in a statement.

Although soccer is not required to change its rules — the anti-doping agency has no power to impose sanctions — adherence to the world anti-doping code is required by the International Olympic Committee as a condition of being an Olympic sport.

The two organizations had asked the arbitration panel to resolve the issue. Soccer's federation has resisted adopting an automatic two-year ban because it supports determining the level of an athlete's guilt instead of using the zero-tolerance standard. Some of soccer's sanctions for doping violations have been as short as six months.

An automatic two-year ban would affect club play as well.'

But the IOC needs soccer in the summer Olympics to draw audiences in much of the world. It's become a mini-World Cup, But FIFA needs to get it's anti-doping rules in order.

This is a fight they don't need. With real issues like racism in Europeans soccer, they couldlive without this fight.

FIFA already has real problems with clubs. Two year bans could ruin European clubs chances for lucrative championship play. Which is why FIFA has flexible rules. The IOC wants a ban basically for other sports., but needs soccer to conform.

The IOC will go far to keep soccer, and FIFA will go far to avoid the stigma of being booted over doping rules

posted by Steve @ 12:04:00 AM

12:04:00 AM

The News Blog home page


Editorial Staff

Add to My AOL

Support The News Blog

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
News Blog Food Blog
Visit the News Blog Food Blog
The News Blog Shops
Operation Yellow Elephant
Enlist, Young Republicans