Steve and Jen bring you this daily review of the news
Premium Advertiser

News Blog Sponsors

News Links

BBC World Service
The Guardian
Washington Post
Iraq Order of Battle
NY Times
LA Times
ABC News

Blogs We Like

Daily Kos
Digby's Blog
Operation Yellow Elephant
Iraq Casualty Count
Media Matters
Talking Points
Defense Tech
Intel Dump
Soldiers for the Truth
Margaret Cho
Juan Cole
Just a Bump in the Beltway
Baghdad Burning
Howard Stern
Michael Moore
James Wolcott
Cooking for Engineers
There is No Crisis
Whiskey Bar
Rude Pundit
Crooks and Liars
Amazin' Avenue
DC Media Girl
The Server Logs

Blogger Credits

Powered by Blogger

Archives by
Publication Date
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
Comments Credits
Comments by YACCS
Monday, February 20, 2006

Very interesting

Can we get some faith-based
money, too?

This is from a Kos Diary

i GUESS you MISSED it : $500 million vs. gay rights
by Troutfishing

Sun Feb 19, 2006 at 06:13:14 PM PDT

what ?

Well, $500 million in new "faith based" anti-gay federal funding

OK, that's the BAD news. I've laid out the picture here at Talk To Action ( read it - you really need to know what's going on with the porkslush fund called "faith based" ), and the bad news is really bad, but I've got a few ideas on what can be done.

Here's the short version of the story :

President George W. Bush quietly signed legislation adding even further - by half a billion dollars, to be spent over 5 years - to the growing rivers of federal cash flowing to "Faith Based" initiatives that are both allowed to practice religious discrimination in hiring and also, by mandate of federal law, enjoined - claims the Bush Administration - from using federal "faith based" money targeted at strengthening marriages to help gay couples who are married or have domestic partnerships and civil unions.

First of all, consider this : George W. Bush just signed off on 1/2 billion dollars of "faith based" federal spending that specifically discriminates against gay couples....

The gay rights movement has long had to fend for itself, but this really shocked me :

5 minor news sources covered this story - the new federal "faith based" pro-marriage spending. Two Christian right organizations, two pro gay news services, and the Online Journal

Mainstream eyes were - it seems - far, far away, and this fact was almost certainly noticed by many on the Christian right and the gay activist community. These dual messages seemed quite clear : One, that the Christian right was free, via its partisans in the White and the Congress, to advance its program of supplanting secular federal social programs with "faith based" efforts that can be discriminatory and even bigoted. Two, that the gay community, in its battles against anti-gay forces on the Christian right, was more or less alone.

However, Americans opposed to Christian theocratic government might do well to consider the implications of this statement from a Buzzflash interview with author and Talk To Action contributor Esther Kaplan :

Bush's faith-based initiative also privileges Christianity above all other religions. After sifting through every grant announcement I could get my hands on from Bush's faith-based offices, I couldn't find a single grant issued to a religious charity that wasn't Christian -- no Jewish charities, no Muslim charities, nothing. And when I spoke with Jim Towey, director of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, he confirmed that no direct federal grants from his program had gone to a non-Christian religious group. This kind of religious favoritism is exactly what the Constitution's establishment clause was put in place to prevent.

As I wrote last February, 2005, the pot of federal funds that in theory was open for applications from "faith based" agencies was in fact quite enormous - possibly up to $100 billion dollars - and puts Kaplan's confirmation from Jim Towey in a rather stark light : the actual scope of burgeoning "faith based" government is in all likelihood far outstripping the ability of reporters, writers, independent researchers, and the media overall to even get a general bearing on the situation.

To compound the situation, "faith based" programs seem to be accompanied by "faith based" accounting. Daniel Zwerdling, producer of two 2003 programs on the faith-based initiative, for Bill Moyers TV show, is quoted as saying :

"administration spokesmen say they can't break down how much money has gone so far to religious groups .. they claim they don't keep that information."

No. Accounting.

Oh my.


What to do ? Well, look at it this way :

Existing "faith based" spending is solely going to Christian groups ( or was as of when Esther Kaplan interviewed "Faith Based" office head Jim Towey ) but - in theory - any faith organizations can apply. What's necessary is the documentation of pervasive disrimination in the allocation of "Faith Based" contracts. There's a need to establish a clear pattern of biased "faith based" funding allocation.

That shouldn't be very hard, but real faith groups - Christian left, Buddhist, Muslim, Jewish, B'ahai - whatever and whoever, there's a vast spctrum of religious diversity in the US - need to apply for "faith based" funding. AND, those groups need to document their experiences of the process.

Then, if a pattern of obvious discrimination surfaces, well.....

That's anti-American, and that 's news

Further, I see no reason why such faith based organizations can't hire gay couples and pay them to promote straight marriage.

In Massachusetts, Texas, wherever.

We're working with a weak hand - we need to get creative, and fast.

After all, the current ruling is that religious groups receiving federal funds can hire whoever they damn well please, on basically whatever criteria they care to choose. So : gay, straight, bi. trans.....

In other words, I'm suggesting this :

The Bush Administration may be around for a bit yet. But, who's aggressively promoting - or trying to do that - progressive interests under the "faith based" cash giveaway ?

Hey folks, the money's being SHOVELLED out.

Apply !

If you're turned down, share stories, then sue.

As far as I can tell, a few lawsuits might help insure a more equitable distribution of these funds. Or at least expose the travest

In the end, politics is about money and they're collecting their payoff.

posted by Steve @ 12:02:00 AM

12:02:00 AM

The News Blog home page


Editorial Staff

Add to My AOL

Support The News Blog

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
News Blog Food Blog
Visit the News Blog Food Blog
The News Blog Shops
Operation Yellow Elephant
Enlist, Young Republicans