Steve and Jen bring you this daily review of the news
Premium Advertiser

News Blog Sponsors

News Links

BBC World Service
The Guardian
Washington Post
Iraq Order of Battle
NY Times
LA Times
ABC News

Blogs We Like

Daily Kos
Digby's Blog
Operation Yellow Elephant
Iraq Casualty Count
Media Matters
Talking Points
Defense Tech
Intel Dump
Soldiers for the Truth
Margaret Cho
Juan Cole
Just a Bump in the Beltway
Baghdad Burning
Howard Stern
Michael Moore
James Wolcott
Cooking for Engineers
There is No Crisis
Whiskey Bar
Rude Pundit
Crooks and Liars
Amazin' Avenue
DC Media Girl
The Server Logs

Blogger Credits

Powered by Blogger

Archives by
Publication Date
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
Comments Credits
Comments by YACCS
Monday, August 23, 2004

The neverending war, pt II

The Mekong Delta

Once More a Nation Divided

By David H. Hackworth


But politics and style aside, Kerry did serve with distinction in Vietnam when he easily could have avoided that killing field. His service to his country shouldn’t be diminished by the same despicable, politically motivated tactics visited upon Sens. John McCain in South Carolina and Max Cleland in Georgia, also Viet vets. This kind of gutter-bashing doesn’t belong in American politics, and vets shouldn’t allow themselves to be used as ammo for cheap shots at one of their own.

The stalwart Brown Water Navy warriors who fought at Kerry’s side say he was A-OK, which is good enough for me. The muckrakers such as John O’Neill and his Swiftboat snipers – who didn’t sail on his boat but served anywhere from 100 meters to 300 miles away – are now coming off like eyewitnesses when in fact not one of their testimonies would hold up in a court of law. A judge would call these men liars and disallow their biased statements.


O’Neill and his chorus of haters are still in their get-Kerry mode. I suspect the decades-long fury is still fueled by Kerry’s high-profile anti-war stance when he returned home. That was a position that was taken by hundreds of thousands of other Viet vets, including myself in 1971 – which, according to Joe Califono's recent book, Inside: A Public Life, almost cost me my life.

McCain has already asked President Bush to distance himself from this “dishonest and dishonorable” attack. Advice that Bush should take one step further by ordering Vietnam draft-dodger Karl Rove and the rest of the character-assassination squad who zapped McCain and Cleland to back off. And then publicly stand tall and say that this type of behavior insults every vet who’s served America in peace and war.

As our commander in chief, Bush also needs to bear in mind that the U.S. Navy and its high standards for handling awards are now on trial as well. Hopefully, the president’s righteous actions will expedite that institution’s exoneration along with Lt. John Kerry’s heroism.

Hopefully, too, these angry, troubled vets still haunted by the Vietnam War will eventually find closure. But one thing I know for sure – it won’t come from fratricide.

David Hackworth, hardly a doctrinare liberal, was the distinguished commander of two battalions in Vietnam, one in the 9th Infantry Division, which provided the ground combat units for the Brown Water Navy, as the coastal naval units in Vietnam were called. If anyone knows the conditions of combat in the Delta, it's Hackworth.

This is a man who supported Bush in 2000 as well.

Hackworth became famous when he retired from the Army in 1971, he had lied about his age when he joined the Army as an enlistee in 1946, was given a battlefield commission in 1951 and rose to the rank of captain, and company commander, by 1952.

While some people disagree with him, he's respected by the current military because he's an advocate of average soldiers. But on something like this, Hackworth is a lot more credible than Bob Dole. Because not only was he there, he was a career soldier as both enlisted man and officer.

He also makes the point that this is a sad debate. John Kerry won his medals and these men didn't know anything about how he did it. They want to diminish him, but they only diminish their own deeds. It's a shame, John O'Neill slanders his own bravery and service to harm John Kerry, who seems to have had a reasonably successful life. All these men who served with Kerry risked their lives. They should be respected for that. Instead, they're going to be ridiculed and exposed as liars, and in the end, that is what people will remember, not the fact that they all served their country in a dangerous job.

Because if John Kerry was a fraud, by extension, aren't they all frauds? Aren't all their medals questionable? Even the men that died? Is that how they want to be remembered? Slandering the dead, as well as diminishing their own acts?

posted by Steve @ 12:29:00 PM

12:29:00 PM

The News Blog home page


Editorial Staff

Add to My AOL

Support The News Blog

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
News Blog Food Blog
Visit the News Blog Food Blog
The News Blog Shops
Operation Yellow Elephant
Enlist, Young Republicans